<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Business and Insurance Reviews &#187; Economy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fletchcetera.com/category/economy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fletchcetera.com</link>
	<description>A Reference for Business and Insurance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:01:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Credit Trap and How to Escape It</title>
		<link>http://www.fletchcetera.com/the-credit-trap-and-how-to-escape-it/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.fletchcetera.com/the-credit-trap-and-how-to-escape-it/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 08:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fletchcetera.com/?p=467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back two years ago and beyond that, the banks were lending money to individuals whether they could pay it back or not. I think greed took over and the banks began to not care about whether the borrower could pay it back or not, if they defaulted then the bank could just charge more interest [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back two years ago and beyond that, the banks were lending money to individuals whether they could pay it back or not. I think greed took over and the banks began to not care about whether the borrower could pay it back or not, if they defaulted then the bank could just charge more interest and compound interest on interest and make even more money. I know of cases where individuals would go into the bank to borrow lets say $100,000 and the bank would talk them into $150,000 a more expensive house, car or equity line. The borrowers know what they can comfortably pay back but when a lending institution is telling you, you can afford more I think people just wanted to believe them.</p>
<p>I think for the most part the American public confuses the definition of an asset verses a liability. They do not consider the fact that liabilities; credit cards, mortgage loans, car loans, furniture loans, home equity loans etc. all cut into their ability to build assets. Assets are things that make you money not things that cost you money. Assets are what you need in order to become wealthy. Liabilities are the things that can ultimately make you poor. It is a very common misnomer that people living in large houses and driving expensive cars are rich. Things like this do not necessarily define wealth. Wealth is only present when the assets on a financial statement out way the liabilities. To make it simpler if you buy a house and have to mortgage it, that mortgage is a liability therefore the house cannot be defined as an asset. It is only an asset if it does not have a mortgage.</p>
<p>The key to wealth is eliminating your liabilities and building your assets. Of course it is difficult to build assets if all of your income is being eaten away by living expenses and then liabilities. The first step would be to eliminate the liabilities as quickly as possible. Do not take on any additional liabilities during this process. Remember that a liability is anything that does not make you money but costs you money. Once you have eliminated the liabilities then you should start looking to acquire more assets.</p>
<p>The best advice I think I have ever received is not to get caught up in the credit trap. Once you get in it is very hard to get out but it can be done with discipline. If you have to buy something with a credit card you probably cannot afford to have that item. Again this is where self discipline comes in. Try to stop and ask yourself if you really need it before you buy it. Think about whether or not it is an asset or a liability. If it is a liability you probably can live without it. Little purchases do add up to eventually large amounts of money. Avoid the credit trap. You will be glad you did and you will have a much better chance at building assets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fletchcetera.com/the-credit-trap-and-how-to-escape-it/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Economic Development Tax Abatement For Economic Development</title>
		<link>http://www.fletchcetera.com/economic-development-tax-abatement-for-economic-development/index.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.fletchcetera.com/economic-development-tax-abatement-for-economic-development/index.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newsomenews.com/economic-development-tax-abatement-for-economic-development/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tax abatement can be defined as a short-term elimination of increased real property taxes, characteristically provided as incentive for new growth or as a motivation for redevelopment. Such economic development tax abatement basically helps business and property owners to increase their capital investment which in turn enlarges the tax base, generates and keeps good paying [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:kzXhM-07AX6fQM:http://thekansascitypost.com/blog_images/hundred%2520on%2520fish%2520hook.jpg" align="left" height="84" width="127" />Tax abatement can be defined as a short-term elimination of increased real property taxes, characteristically provided as incentive for new growth or as a motivation for redevelopment. Such economic development tax abatement basically helps business and property owners to increase their capital investment which in turn enlarges the tax base, generates and keeps good paying jobs, and expands the local economy. In the USA, the Department of Community Development&#8217;s Division of Neighborhood Development administers the tax abatement program. This department is accountable for the administration of tax abatement for housing, homeowners and residential developers. It needs to be known that tax abatement does not come with 100% tax incentives. Further, it is to be noted that the swell in the assessed value because of the project will steadily phase over in one to ten year duration. Different states view tax abatements differently. The City of Indianapolis, for instance, views the granting of tax abatement as a public sector investment in the company.<span id="more-305"></span> It, accordingly, makes an evaluation of each applicant on the basis of the policy criteria when making a proposal to the Metropolitan Development <img src="http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:fdVcOVwlw8W_DM:http://www.taxincentivezone.com/blog/blog-images/tax16.jpg" align="right" height="116" width="116" />Commission for tax abatement. If we have to look at the historic aspect of tax abatement and the subsequent economic development, we must point out that it was first authorized by the State in 1977. The idea back then was to give the government the opportunity for certain businesses to phase-in those new taxes that would otherwise be assessed to their property because of new building construction or the purchase of new equipment for manufacturing, research and development and information technology. For this reason, the businesses that were to be provided tax abatement were located in industries like manufacturing, warehousing and distribution. Presently, the major benefit from tax abatement is to encourage reinvestment by existing businesses. The focus is that the government is not interested in penalizing businesses with large tax bills when they are not in a position to afford it. Leniency is shown also because they have done an improvement by investing money in their facilities, and because such companies are creating/providing job opportunities for the citizens. It is true that without this tax incentive, businesses would not be goaded to make committed investments of capital with a view to improving their operations. Besides, the term development area would not be heard so commonly by people as the case seems to be these days. This might have given you enough hints about how economic development tax abatement is used to increase economic development these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fletchcetera.com/economic-development-tax-abatement-for-economic-development/index.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
